The number of relations on the set A={1,2,3}A = \{1, 2, 3\} containing at most 6 elements including (1,2)(1, 2), which are reflexive and transitive but not symmetric, is _____

Answer: 5

Step-by-step solution

Step 1: Understand the properties of the relation

We are given a set A={1,2,3}A = \{1, 2, 3\}. We need to find the number of relations RR on AA that satisfy several conditions: it must be reflexive, transitive, not symmetric, contain the element (1,2)(1, 2), and have at most 6 elements.

Step 2: Apply reflexivity condition

For a relation RR on set AA to be reflexive, every element in AA must be related to itself. Therefore, the pairs (1,1)(1{,}1), (2,2)(2{,}2), and (3,3)(3{,}3) must be in RR. These are 3 elements.

Step 3: Apply the given element condition

The problem states that the relation RR must include the element (1,2)(1{,}2). This is an additional element to the reflexive pairs.

Step 4: Apply transitivity condition

Since (1,2)∈R(1{,}2) \in R and (2,2)∈R(2{,}2) \in R, by transitivity, (1,2)(1{,}2) must be in RR, which is already established. Similarly, (1,1)∈R(1{,}1) \in R and (1,2)∈R(1{,}2) \in R implies (1,2)∈R(1{,}2) \in R. No new elements are forced by transitivity with just (1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2)(1{,}1), (2{,}2), (3{,}3), (1{,}2) present.

Step 5: Apply non-symmetry condition

For the relation to be not symmetric, since (1,2)∈R(1{,}2) \in R, it must be that (2,1)∉R(2{,}1) \notin R. If (2,1)(2{,}1) were in RR, then the relation would be symmetric with respect to (1,2)(1{,}2) and (2,1)(2{,}1).

Step 6: Consider possible additional elements

We currently have 4 elements: (1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2)(1{,}1), (2{,}2), (3{,}3), (1{,}2). The relation must have at most 6 elements, meaning we can add at most 2 more elements. The pairs (2,1)(2{,}1) is forbidden. The remaining pairs to consider are (1,3),(2,3),(3,1),(3,2)(1{,}3), (2{,}3), (3{,}1), (3{,}2). We need to check transitivity for each case.

Step 7: Evaluate cases for adding elements

Let's analyze the possible relations: 1. R1={(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2)}R_1 = \{(1{,}1), (2{,}2), (3{,}3), (1{,}2)\}: Reflexive, contains (1,2)(1{,}2), not symmetric (since (2,1)∉R1(2{,}1) \notin R_1), transitive. This is a valid relation. 2. If we add (1,3)(1{,}3): R2={(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(1,3)}R_2 = \{(1{,}1), (2{,}2), (3{,}3), (1{,}2), (1{,}3)\}. Reflexive, contains (1,2)(1{,}2), not symmetric (since (2,1)∉R2(2{,}1) \notin R_2 and (3,1)∉R2(3{,}1) \notin R_2), transitive. This is valid. 3. If we add (2,3)(2{,}3): R3={(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(2,3)}R_3 = \{(1{,}1), (2{,}2), (3{,}3), (1{,}2), (2{,}3)\}. Reflexive, contains (1,2)(1{,}2), not symmetric (since (2,1)∉R3(2{,}1) \notin R_3 and (3,2)∉R3(3{,}2) \notin R_3). Transitivity: (1,2)∈R3(1{,}2) \in R_3 and (2,3)∈R3  ⟹  (1,3)∈R3(2{,}3) \in R_3 \implies (1{,}3) \in R_3. So, R3R_3 must contain (1,3)(1{,}3) to be transitive. But then it would have 6 elements: {(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(2,3),(1,3)}\{(1{,}1), (2{,}2), (3{,}3), (1{,}2), (2{,}3), (1{,}3)\}. This is R4R_4. If we only add (2,3)(2{,}3) and not (1,3)(1{,}3), it's not transitive. 4. If we add (3,1)(3{,}1): R5={(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(3,1)}R_5 = \{(1{,}1), (2{,}2), (3{,}3), (1{,}2), (3{,}1)\}. Transitivity: (3,1)∈R5(3{,}1) \in R_5 and (1,2)∈R5  ⟹  (3,2)∈R5(1{,}2) \in R_5 \implies (3{,}2) \in R_5. So R5R_5 must contain (3,2)(3{,}2). Also, (1,2)∈R5(1{,}2) \in R_5 and (2,2)∈R5  ⟹  (1,2)∈R5(2{,}2) \in R_5 \implies (1{,}2) \in R_5. (3,1)∈R5(3{,}1) \in R_5 and (1,1)∈R5  ⟹  (3,1)∈R5(1{,}1) \in R_5 \implies (3{,}1) \in R_5. If (3,1)(3{,}1) is added, (3,2)(3{,}2) must also be added for transitivity. This would make 6 elements: {(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(3,1),(3,2)}\{(1{,}1), (2{,}2), (3{,}3), (1{,}2), (3{,}1), (3{,}2)\}. This relation is not symmetric (since (1,3)∉R5(1{,}3) \notin R_5 and (2,3)∉R5(2{,}3) \notin R_5). This is a valid relation. 5. If we add (3,2)(3{,}2): R6={(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(3,2)}R_6 = \{(1{,}1), (2{,}2), (3{,}3), (1{,}2), (3{,}2)\}. Transitivity: (3,2)∈R6(3{,}2) \in R_6 and (2,2)∈R6  ⟹  (3,2)∈R6(2{,}2) \in R_6 \implies (3{,}2) \in R_6. (1,2)∈R6(1{,}2) \in R_6 and (2,2)∈R6  ⟹  (1,2)∈R6(2{,}2) \in R_6 \implies (1{,}2) \in R_6. No new elements are forced. This relation is not symmetric (since (2,3)∉R6(2{,}3) \notin R_6). This is a valid relation. Let's list the valid relations with at most 6 elements: - RA={(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2)}R_A = \{(1{,}1), (2{,}2), (3{,}3), (1{,}2)\} (4 elements) - RB={(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(1,3)}R_B = \{(1{,}1), (2{,}2), (3{,}3), (1{,}2), (1{,}3)\} (5 elements) - RC={(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(2,3),(1,3)}R_C = \{(1{,}1), (2{,}2), (3{,}3), (1{,}2), (2{,}3), (1{,}3)\} (6 elements, forced by transitivity from (1,2)(1{,}2) and (2,3)(2{,}3)) - RD={(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(3,2)}R_D = \{(1{,}1), (2{,}2), (3{,}3), (1{,}2), (3{,}2)\} (5 elements) - RE={(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(3,1),(3,2)}R_E = \{(1{,}1), (2{,}2), (3{,}3), (1{,}2), (3{,}1), (3{,}2)\} (6 elements, forced by transitivity from (3,1)(3{,}1) and (1,2)(1{,}2)) We need to ensure no other elements are forced by transitivity that would make the relation symmetric or exceed 6 elements. Consider RCR_C: (1,2)∈RC(1{,}2) \in R_C and (2,3)∈RC  ⟹  (1,3)∈RC(2{,}3) \in R_C \implies (1{,}3) \in R_C. All pairs are present. Not symmetric because (2,1)∉RC(2{,}1) \notin R_C, (3,1)∉RC(3{,}1) \notin R_C, (3,2)∉RC(3{,}2) \notin R_C. Consider RER_E: (3,1)∈RE(3{,}1) \in R_E and (1,2)∈RE  ⟹  (3,2)∈RE(1{,}2) \in R_E \implies (3{,}2) \in R_E. All pairs are present. Not symmetric because (1,3)∉RE(1{,}3) \notin R_E, (2,1)∉RE(2{,}1) \notin R_E, (2,3)∉RE(2{,}3) \notin R_E. So there are 5 such relations.

More from this chapter

All Relations and Functions solutions →

Solve your own maths question free →